blog.co.uk  »  Next Blog  »    Create your own blog for free •   •  Flag this blog Login

SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF EXISTENCE OF GOD

by smile @ 2005-05-02 - 11:16:28

According to Oxford dictionary science is a branch of knowledge requiring systematic study and method, esp. dealing with substances, life, and natural laws. So science categorizes everything, which exists as known, unknown and unknowable. Known is the science, unknown is that on which scientists work and will be known in due course of time and there is nothing such as unknowable in the field of science. According to the scientists there can’t be any mystery in this world and sooner or later the science has the capability to reveal that mystery by using scientific methods. The scientific community tries to create scientific temperament among the general masses by asking the people to inquire about everything that exists and asks them to reject those things which does not have RATIONAL explanation. Believe in what you can see (e.g. light), feel (e.g. your body) and hear (e.g. sound vibration). To be more precise scientists assert that believe only on your senses, that which can be perceived by our senses is scientifically possible, is rational otherwise it is a myth and should be discarded as blind faith.

Should a scientist believe in God? The question, which have always baffled the scientific community and the common people. God cannot be perceived by our senses and till now there has been no scientific instrument, which can detect the presence of God in the cosmos. The common answer, which one generally gets from most of the people, is that Religion is FAITH and Science is REALITY.
One of my friend has no hesitation in accepting God, instead he minced no words in criticising the scientists who deny the existence of God. He did not believe in Big-Bang theory because according to him the theory cannot be proved experimentally. He believed in the existence of some supernatural power who controls everything .He justified his point by giving the example of Mother Teresa who healed one patient.
But the other friend of mine was not convinced. He was ready to accept GOD if God Himself comes and proves His existence. I love my mother because I can feel her and I do not love God because I can’t feel Him was his instant reply.

Most of the people irrespective of their religion are sure about one thing,
They have faith in God, though there is no scientific proof. They believed in God because many others believed.

Faith is to accept without inquiring, put trust without probing and acknowledge without prying. In other words Religion or accepting God or believing in some supernatural power is considered to be irrational which is based on some wild imagination. Is accepting God really irrational? Do science have the potential to explain everything that exists in the entire cosmos? Does science does not make any assumptions?
1) TIME-WHAT IS IT?
Though the reality of time, especially in the form of its effect on us is undeniable, time is one among the many fundamental truths of life that defy scientific definition. Be that as it may, we measure time by the movement of the cosmic bodies. As per current scientific understanding, one year is the time in which the earth completes one revolution around the sun. For an object orbiting continuously in a circular path, no point on the orbit can be considered special. So scientifically there’s nothing “New” when we celebrate the New Year; the earth is going to continue in its same old path! Moreover no one can see, feel, smell, taste and hear TIME i.e. we cannot perceive time with our senses, yet no one can deny its existence.

2) Mathematicians throughout the world work with an imaginary number, which is the square root of minus 1.Important branches of mathematics –for example, the theory of analytical function –, are based on this imaginary unit. Without the help of this branch of mathematics, various complex theories and problems cannot be solved. Thus the existence of this number cannot be denied, yet there is no experimental proof of its existence.

3) Another scientific theory that is beyond the limit of experimental science is
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle .In mathematical language, it is stated that the product of the uncertainties in the measured values of the position and momentum (product of mass and velocity) cannot be smaller than Plank’s constant. No existing experimental technique can prove this principle. However, scientists all over the world accept this statement as fact, knowing that the experimental proof is beyond their ability.

4) Similarly there is no scientific experiment to prove the Third Law Of Thermodynamics. This law as formulated by Planck, states that the entropy of a perfect crystal at absolute zero degrees is equal to zero. Factually there is no means available for measuring directly the absolute entropies. Therefore the proof of this law is beyond the realm of experimental science.

PROOF OF GOD’S EXISTENCE.

Sir Isaac Newton had a small scale model of solar system which was placed on a table in his room .The model was perfectly designed and
Everything rotated and orbited when a crank was turned. When one of his friend show it he immediately inquired about the artisan who had made it so beautiful. Newton with all seriousness replied, the previous night some explosion took place in my house
And this solar system was formed. The friend was not at all amused. Finally Newton explained,” You refuse to believe that this puny contraption came about by chance and yet you are convinced that the great original, the actual solar system, of which this mechanism is only a model has come into being without either a designer or a maker. Now tell me, by what sort of reasoning do you reach such an absurd conclusion.

Everything we use has a designer. Someone designed a pen, a wristwatch or the china wall –all; they never popped up by chance.

Several trains, aeroplanes move in a well-coordinated manner and reach their destination without any difficulty –all these are possible because of well-coordinated controlling system.
The giant sequoia tree develop and grows over 300 feet high with a diameter of unto 36feet from a tiny seed which is not bigger than the size of a pinhead.

Obviously all these things are happening as per the laws of nature, but can there be any law without a lawmaker? The very presence of a law implies the presence of a lawmaker who imposes the law. Even a simple road sign that regulates traffic has an originator and a controller. What then of the great comprehensive laws that governs this entire universe? Such brilliantly conceived laws surely bear witness to a brilliant lawmaker.
As Srila Prabhupad the founder Acharya of International Society Of Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) would say that any human being with a little common sense can understand the presence GOD.

PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR
India


Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

comaboycomaboy [Member]
05/03/05 @ 02:22

I like to stay open minded, but your arguement is flawed. If something complicated exists, therefore, it must have had a creator? Everything we use has a designer? Surely then this means that god had a designer or creator too, and this entity also has a creator or designer, and so on, ad infinatum.
As with most arguements for the existence of a god, yours is based on claiming that while science does not provide enough proof, the existence of god needs no proof, the very root of faith.

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).

Recent Posts

  1. Letter To Khusboo Mam
    by smile on 2005-12-17
  2. Sadhu with a religious horse
    by smile on 2005-08-12
  3. My Love...
    by smile on 2005-07-22
  4. The Beautiful Eyes.......
    by smile on 2005-07-22
  5. JUST PUSH
    by smile on 2005-05-05
  6. A PARABLE TO PONDER...
    by smile on 2005-04-30
  7. Unanswered questions of “BIG BANG”
    by smile on 2005-04-28
  8. the selfish attitude
    by smile on 2005-04-26